ABOUT
US

DILO- SF6 Leak Detection
DILO Company, Inc- Maintenance Equipment for SF6 Switchgear
DILO Company, Inc. - Contact US

The State of Insulating Gas Management: Where the Industry Stands in 2026

SF6 Gas Info & Handling TipsIndustry News/Regulatory Updates

Most organizations still handle SF₆ every day — but many are struggling to keep up with increasing operational complexity. According to DILO’s recent industry survey, only 41.7% of respondents feel very confident in their current gas management readiness, while 50% still rely on spreadsheets or no formal tracking system. From cylinder logistics to inventory visibility and multi-gas readiness, the findings reveal growing gaps in operational control. Read the blog preview and download the full benchmark report to see how your organization compares.

Table of Content

  • Introduction
  • The Confidence Gap Is Growing
  • Operational Complexity Is Increasing
  • Spreadsheets Are Still Common — But Visibility Remains Limited
  • What Organizations Want Next
  • Conclusion
  • Download the Full Insulating Gas Management Benchmark Report

Introduction

Insulating gas management is entering a more complex phase.

To better understand where the industry stands, DILO surveyed utilities, OEMs, service providers, and specialized support organizations about how they currently manage SF₆ operations, tracking, compliance, and operational readiness. The results reveal a growing gap between day-to-day gas handling demands and the systems organizations rely on to manage them.

While SF₆ remains widely used across the industry, operational complexity is increasing as organizations face tighter reporting requirements, evolving regulations, workforce challenges, and the gradual introduction of alternative gas mixtures.

The survey findings point to a clear trend: the industry is not lacking experience — it is lacking visibility and operational control.

The Confidence Gap Is Growing

According to survey responses, 95.8% of organizations still actively handle SF₆ gas. However, only 41.7% reported feeling “very confident” in their current readiness and gas management processes.

At the same time:

  • 50% of respondents rely on spreadsheets or have no formal gas tracking system
  • 45.8% identified cylinder management and storage logistics as a major challenge
  • 41.7% cited limited visibility into gas movement and inventory
  • 41.7% identified training and certification gaps as a key operational concern

These findings suggest that many organizations are still managing increasingly complex gas operations with fragmented or manual workflows.

Download the Full Industry Benchmark Report   Access detailed survey findings and benchmarking insights from utilities, OEMs, and service providers across the insulating gas industry.   Includes: ✔ Readiness benchmarks ✔ Tracking and reporting trends ✔ Multi-gas management insights ✔ Operational challenges and recommendations    

Operational Complexity Is Increasing

For decades, SF₆ has been the dominant insulating gas used in power systems due to its reliability and dielectric performance. That remains true today.

However, organizations are increasingly being asked to manage more than just SF₆.

Survey respondents reported handling:

  • N₂/CO₂ mixtures
  • C4-FN and C5-FK alternative gas mixtures
  • Mixed gas environments requiring stricter contamination controls

As multiple gas types enter operations, organizations face new challenges involving:

  • cylinder segregation
  • gas quality management
  • cross-contamination prevention
  • equipment compatibility
  • technician training

This transition is creating operational demands that many legacy tracking systems were never designed to support.

Spreadsheets Are Still Common — But Visibility Remains Limited

Despite increasing operational complexity, spreadsheets remain one of the most common gas tracking methods across the industry.

While spreadsheets provide flexibility, they can become difficult to manage across multiple sites, teams, contractors, and gas types. Manual tracking processes often limit real-time visibility and make reporting more reactive than proactive.

As regulatory expectations continue to evolve, organizations are placing greater emphasis on:

  • auditable processes
  • centralized data visibility
  • emissions tracking accuracy
  • operational accountability
  • workforce readiness

The survey findings indicate that many organizations are actively looking for ways to improve operational control and reporting confidence.

What Organizations Want Next

When asked where improvements are most needed, respondents identified several clear priorities:

  • 58.3% want equipment upgrades or retrofits
  • 50% want additional on-site training or certification
  • 45.8% want clearer regulations or guidance
  • 29.2% want better digital tracking tools

These priorities reflect a broader shift happening across the industry: insulating gas management is becoming more data-driven, process-oriented, and operationally critical.

Conclusion

The insulating gas industry is evolving quickly, but operational readiness remains uneven.

Organizations are being asked to manage increasing complexity while maintaining compliance, minimizing emissions, improving visibility, and preparing for future gas handling requirements.

Those that invest early in stronger processes, training, and operational visibility will be better positioned for the future.

Download the Full Insulating Gas Management Benchmark Report

See how your organization compares to utilities, OEMs, and service providers across the industry.

Access the full report for detailed survey findings, benchmarking insights, operational trends, and recommendations for improving gas management readiness.

Download Report